
Rumour
had it that this
was inspired by the cinematic
dessication of Margaret Atwood's book Surfacing,
in a
1981 film by Claude
Jutra, which, due to an American screenwriter, bore no relation to the
original novel.
Related Reviews:
My Pleasure is My Business
Screwball Academy
SEARCH
Hollywood North
Guest Review by Patrick Lowe
Midway through Hollywood
North, a comic account of Canada's movie industry
in the late '70s, a rare thing occurs—a scene which manages
to reveal
both
the philosophy as well as the fundamental flaw of the entire picture.
On the
set of the fictional, out-of-control production Flight to Bogota,
the energetic, but
naive producer Bobby Mayers (Matthew Modine) must contend with yet
another SNAFU—an unexpected and unwelcome visit from haughty
Can-lit
queen
Lindsay May Marshall (Clare Coulter). Realizing that her
Governor-General
award-winning book Lantern
Moon (on which Bogota
is based on) has been
trashed for a glitzier, more "American" product, Marshall vents her
rage upon
Mayers, declaring "If God were Canadian, he would come down and destroy
you
and this production in a fiery apocalyptic rebuke!"
Somehow, Marshall's Old Testament-style furor reveals more about Hollywood North's
own thwarted ambitions than its purported target: the dreaded
tax-shelter
era of 1978-83—that embarassing but over-villified reign of
the
Capital Cost
Allowance, when dentists and lawyers invested in the nation's largest
output
of motion pictures for a 100% tax write-off. It has also been
the source of way too much knee-jerk nationalist lamentation, as just a
mention of the topic will cause Canada's highbrows to cover themselves
in
sackcloth and mourn over so much spilled milk. As if in answer to their
pleas for atonement, Peter O'Brian, a veteran producer of the era,
decided a
little comic purging was in order. Hence the long-awaited Hollywood North, a
film that was originally to have been produced in 1987, with director
Zale Dalen
(Skip Tracer)
at the helm. When that fell through, the project was repeatedly
postponed over a
period of 16 years, until O'Brian decided to direct the
movie himself. And in some ways, it was only fitting that he do so.
O'Brian
had plenty of first-hand experience of the tax-shelter era, and had
gone
through the best and the worst for not only had he suffered through
the
disastrous production of Mr.
Patman (a 1980 thriller starring James Coburn),
he did much to refurbish the tarnished image of the film industry with
the
production of The Grey
Fox and My
American Cousin.
As he explained in Take
One magazine: "The (tax shelter) era could have
produced all kinds of great things, but we screwed it up, exploited it
and
destroyed and pillaged and desecrated it... It was out of anger and
frustration over that loss that I wanted to make Hollywood North."
That
might have allowed O'Brian to finish the movie, but good intentions do
not
equate good films. Far from being a stinging look at our country's
epoch of
cinematic shame, it's a toothless satire that aims at obvious targets
and
draws comic blanks. Granted, O'Brian's directorial debut is funnier
than
Paint Cans,
Paul Donovan's insipid attempt to lampoon Telefilm bureaucracy,
but it still falls well below the standards of The Player or Living in
Oblivion. God—if he really is
Canadian—may never show
mercy to Robert Lantos come
judgement day, but given the lukewarm reception of Hollywood North,
perhaps
the Almighty isn't a big fan of cinematic absolution either. After all,
is
an unheralded two-week run in Toronto less punishing than fire and
brimstone?
The film opens with the eager Bobby Mayers in L.A., trying to
enlist
Hollywood
star Michael Baytes (Alan Bates) in order to put some real star power
behind
his adaptation of Lindsay May Marshall's book. Baytes, an aging relic
living out of a bullet-proof trailer dubbed "Alamo," is so shamelessly
right-wing that even Charlton Heston would blush, so naturally the idea
of
going up north doesn't immediately appeal to him. "Canada," he says,
"Is it
a good idea?" But after persuading Baytes to come on board, providing
he is written as the lead role, Mayers heads back to Toronto to round
up the
remaining $5 million from head investor Peter Kasey, (Alan Thicke) plus
the rest of his production crew. With the help of his sleazy cousin
Howard Atkins
(Joe Cobden), Mayers persuades veteran but senile director
Henry
Neville (John Neville) to helm the project, and casts Gillian Stevens,
(Jennifer
Tilly) a whiny nymphomaniac, to play the female lead. Observing the
proceedings is Sandy Ryan, (Deborah Unger) an independent filmmaker
who's
hired to direct the making-of doc, but instead uses the opportunity to
embezzle money from Mayer to finance her own independent feature.
Needless to say, mayhem ensues. A freak blizzard screws up the
film's
exterior South American sets a supporting actor is almost killed while
unofficially doing his own stunt Gillian creates havoc by fornicating
with
her co-star Frankie Candido (Fab Filippo) and Sandy, who is
also
dating Frankie, pushes Bogota overbudget with her constant
need
for funds.
Worse, Baytes reveals himself to be an even bigger looney, demanding
extravagant changes to the script before sinking into a deeper state of
cocaine-fueled xenophobia which is enhanced by the backdrop of the '79
Iranian
revolution on TV. "I've been sold a defective star," Bobby groans, as
he
now scrambles to salvage the remains of his one shot at the big time.
In the
end, God's wrath becomes manifest when Baytes loses his grip on reality
completely. He freaks out on the last day of shooting, convinced
America is
under attack, then blows up his trailer before hightailing it to the
border.
As Sandy explains it to Bobby, pondering the decision he made at the
proverbial fork in the road, "You aimed for Frost but you ended up with
Faust."
In fairness, Hollywood
North does generate its share of guffaws (the
best
gag includes watching the dubbed version of Flight to Bogota
which as
Bobby
explains, sells well overseas). And the film does deliver an accurate
look
into the mindset of all those professional lemmings, who in their
heyday,
jumped at the opportunity to soar like eagles but went turkey-shooting
instead. But by pandering to nationalist sentiments, the script, with
three
writers to its credit, goes too far out of its way to make sure the
audience
WILL GET THE MESSAGE. So, by focusing on Canuck piety, O'Brian lets
the
movie-making satire go stale by falling back on the all-too familiar
caricatures of the genre. They're all there: the swollen star egos an
aspiring but incompetent neophyte the pretentious director and the
ever-amoral money men. Sure, it's fun to watch Bobby's compromised
vision go
downhill as he gets his comeuppance, but it feels all too familiar. And
while
O'Brian is a competent director, he lacks the comic inventiveness of a
John
Paizs or Bruce McDonald to push his film beyond movie-of-the-week
fodder. I don't
know if
the movie would have had more impact if it had been finished in the
late
1980s, but in the shadow of vastly superior home satires like The
Newsroom or Made
In Canada, it's a pretty lukewarm offering.
Even more bizzare are the casting choices, which while palpable, are
less
than inspiring. Matthew Modine is okay as Mayer, getting the '70s
blandness
of his character right, with the sideburns and turtleneck outfits,
though at
times, he seems to do little but just appear sympathetic. Jennifer
Tilly
provides some much needed laughs doing her whining, winsome slut (even
if
she's basically replaying the talentless Olive Neal from Bullets Over
Broadway), but as the film's red-white-and-blue blooded
patriot cum psycho,
Alan Bates is way over his head. With his hammy mannerisms and bizzare
Anglo-Irish accent, he becomes more of a stereotype than an actual
character. In fact,
the part cries out for an actual has-been like Tony Curtis or Barry
Newman
to do the role, exactly the kind of Tinseltown relics that were lured
into
the 70's tax-shelter abyss. And not to quibble, but
for a film so critical of using American star power to bolster Canuck
box-office potential, isn't it just a teensy-bit hypocritical that
O'Brian
should rely on primarily foreign leads for what is supposed to be a
nationalist statement?
Of course, O'Brian wants to make the case for our own homegrown
product,
using Sandy's own film, Human
Voices, as the sincere, if arty counterpoint
to the commercial dreck Bobby is contributing to. Applying a direct
reference to the mythic production story of Don Owen's Nobody Waved Good-bye,
the film is constantly
reminding us how important it is to have one's own voice heard, lest it
be
drowned out from all the noise south of the 49th. It's a message that's
been
parroted by our champions of CanCon, about how our own
stories—whatever
they may be—are more essential to our nation's wellbeing
than another
helping of Prom Night.
But would a better film have been made if Bobby
remained faithful to Lantern
Moon? Are films made any better by catering to
national loyalty rather than the U.S. market? Is our country
any
better or worse off because of the likes of Bear Island or Circle of Two, or
by culturally earnest, but deadly dull productions of
films
like The Wars or Bethune?
Do movies make the nation?
I wish O'Brian could have addressed the kinds of questions our
own
cultural
defenders ignore, trying to foster a cinema that served the country and
not
the other way around. But by appealing to the likes of Mel Hurtig or
Maude
Barlow, O'Brian reaches out to the converted—only the
converted ain't
the
ones lining up around the block to watch this flick. In fact, a radical
film
on the subject might have suggested that the tax-shelter era was
actually a
good thing, maybe satirizing the nationalist poobahs who feel more than
qualified to cast the first stone. And for all the cinematic compost
produced, it can't be denied that the era created a working movie
industry
within our borders plus a handful of really good Canuxploitation
flicks, the
obvious titles being The
Silent Partner, The
Changeling, My
Bloody
Valentine, Quest
for Fire, Ticket
to Heaven, Murder
by Decree, Rock
'N' Rule,
Videodrome,
and Atlantic City.
Which is to say, wretched as the era was, it
wasn't all bad.
Cultural relevance aside, O'Brian had the misfortune of realizing
a
movie-industry satire at a time when the subject had already been done
to
death. Without a fresh angle on the topic, plus the need sermonize, Hollywood
North surrenders too much of its own potential comic
ground. Don McKellar's
Childstar
was more successful at satirizing the Yanks' presence in Toronto
by making its criticisms of the Ugly American more indirect (though the
film
is far from perfect). In any event, let this be a lesson for those
filmmakers wanting to mix didactics with entertainment. Or to quote
Pseudolus from A Funny
Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum: Morals
tomorrow, comedy tonight!

